Skip to content
American Factbook
Menu

Youth Development

The IRS classifies 58,598 tax-exempt organizations under Youth Development, rank 8 of 25 major groups. 2,446 of them have a Form 990 on record.

American Factbook Research

At a glance

58,598
Organizations classified here
By the code the IRS assigned at registration.
58,349
Recognised under 501(c)(3)
The charitable subsection.
2,446
With a Form 990 on record
The only organizations with financial figures here.
$12,544,976,138
Revenue reported
Summed across filings, each for a different year.
$774,704,879
Largest single organization
Revenue on its most recent filing.
4.2%
Share of all classified organizations
Of the organizations that carry a classification code at all.

Taken from the IRS on September 19, 2026. 574,213 organizations carry no code and appear in no category.

Largest by revenue

2 more columns on a wider screen

Organizations classified under Youth Development, by revenue on their most recent Form 990
RankOrganizationRevenue
1CHILD CARE RESOURCE CENTER INC$774,704,879
2YOUNG LIFE$556,261,660
3BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$330,264,592
4FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES$262,386,103
5BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA$229,564,784
6GIRL SCOUTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA$115,591,467
7WILLITS HOSPITAL INC$99,134,003
8NATIONAL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA FOUNDATION$77,946,912
9IPTAY$71,552,779
10HEARTLAND FOR CHILDREN INC$69,460,443
11PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS INC$62,222,656
12JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT USA$57,552,208
13CONSERVATION LEGACY$57,421,813
14YOUTH FOR TOMORROW NEW LIFE CENTER INC$57,182,178
15ALTERNATIVE EDUCATION ACADEMY$53,050,002

Other categories

What this classification is

  • The IRS assigns a code when it recognises an organization and rarely revisits it. This describes what an organization said it would do at registration, which may not be what it does now.
  • Around three in ten recognised organizations carry no code at all, concentrated among older registrations and non-charitable subsections. They are in none of these categories and are counted on the hub instead.
  • The names here are the IRS’s own. Other publishers use a revised taxonomy with different names for several groups, so a figure here will not always line up with one of theirs carrying a similar label.

Full method at methodology.

Sources

Data retrieved