Jay Berdia

What was reported, 2019–2025

$38,088

General payments

305 separate payments. What they were, as CMS records them, is below.

$757

Research payments

Funding for a study, usually paid to an institution with this doctor named on it. Not added to general payments, and not income.

$0

Ownership and investment

The value of a stake this doctor or an immediate family member held.

0

Disputed

This doctor has contested none of the payments reported about them.

How this compares

General payments: $38,088, 2019–⁠2025

By the amount companies reported, 891st among the 18,351 profiles with general payments in Ophthalmology.

General payments: this profile's rank in each group, its place among the profiles nationally and its share of the national total

Nationally	40,867th of 1,688,859
In Maryland	870th of 33,760
In Ophthalmology	891st of 18,351
Profiles below it nationally	More than 97%
Share of the national total	< 0.1%

Research payments: $757, 2019–⁠2025

By the amount companies reported, 526th among the 618 profiles named on research payments in Ophthalmology.

Research payments: this profile's rank in each group, its place among the profiles nationally and its share of the national total

Nationally	17,282nd of 22,827
In Maryland	386th of 528
In Ophthalmology	526th of 618
Profiles below it nationally	More than 24%
Share of the national total	< 0.1%

What the payments were

Each payment as the manufacturer categorized it when reporting it to CMS, across 2019–2025. Together they are the general payments above. A category is the reporter’s, and nothing in the record says a payment in any of them was improper.

By program year

CMS reports a program year at a time and also publishes its own total across them, which is what the figures above are. These rows are that total taken apart, not a second set of payments.

The record

National Provider Identifier

1114260163

The identifier this page is addressed by, and the one both CMS files share.

Specialty

Ophthalmology

Allopathic & Osteopathic Physicians, in CMS's taxonomy.

Licensed in

MD

The state of the license CMS lists first.

Recipient type

Covered Recipient Physician

How CMS classifies the recipient of these payments.

Medicare prescribing

What this provider billed to Medicare Part D in 2024, as CMS published it. Medicare Part D only: what they prescribed outside it is not here.

340

Claims

Prescriptions and refills billed to Part D, as CMS counts them.

$17,535

Total drug cost

What Part D, the plan and the patient paid together. Not what this provider was paid — they are paid nothing out of it.

107

Beneficiaries

People with at least one prescription from this provider.

101

Brand-name claims

Of the claims above, those for a brand-name drug.

239

Generic claims

Of the claims above, those for a generic.

0

Opioid claims

CMS puts this provider's opioid prescribing rate at 0% of their claims. That is their figure, computed from their own unsuppressed data.

not reported

Antibiotic claims

Claims for an antibiotic.

Ophthalmology

Prescriber type

As CMS classifies this prescriber. Credentials: MD.

A blank is not a zero. CMS withholds a value between 1 and 10, and withholds the next lowest alongside it so the first cannot be worked out by subtraction — so a withheld figure is not even evidence that the number was small. Rows for ten or fewer claims are removed from the file altogether, which is why the parts of a total can be withheld while the total is published.

Elsewhere

• Payments to doctors in Maryland — what was reported across the state this doctor practises in.
• What drug and device companies pay doctors — the national picture these figures are part of.
• This record at CMS — the publisher’s own page for this profile.
• The NPI registry — who this identifier belongs to, at CMS.