Carissa Baker-Smith

What was reported, 2019–2025

$4,583

General payments

15 separate payments. What they were, as CMS records them, is below.

$3,054

Research payments

Funding for a study, usually paid to an institution with this doctor named on it. Not added to general payments, and not income.

$0

Ownership and investment

The value of a stake this doctor or an immediate family member held.

0

Disputed

This doctor has contested none of the payments reported about them.

How this compares

General payments: $4,583, 2019–⁠2025

By the amount companies reported, 348th among the 2,289 profiles with general payments in Pediatric Cardiology.

General payments: this profile's rank in each group, its place among the profiles nationally and its share of the national total

Nationally	212,917th of 1,688,859
In Delaware	625th of 5,687
In Pediatric Cardiology	348th of 2,289
Profiles below it nationally	More than 87%
Share of the national total	< 0.1%

Research payments: $3,054, 2019–⁠2025

By the amount companies reported, 35th among the 63 profiles named on research payments in Pediatric Cardiology.

Research payments: this profile's rank in each group, its place among the profiles nationally and its share of the national total

Nationally	11,449th of 22,827
In Delaware	14th of 32
In Pediatric Cardiology	35th of 63
Profiles below it nationally	More than 49%
Share of the national total	< 0.1%

What the payments were

Each payment as the manufacturer categorized it when reporting it to CMS, across 2019–2025. Together they are the general payments above. A category is the reporter’s, and nothing in the record says a payment in any of them was improper.

By program year

CMS reports a program year at a time and also publishes its own total across them, which is what the figures above are. These rows are that total taken apart, not a second set of payments.

The record

National Provider Identifier

1508031121

The identifier this page is addressed by, and the one both CMS files share.

Specialty

Pediatric Cardiology

Allopathic & Osteopathic Physicians, in CMS's taxonomy.

Licensed in

MD

The state of the license CMS lists first.

Recipient type

Covered Recipient Physician

How CMS classifies the recipient of these payments.

Medicare prescribing

What this provider billed to Medicare Part D in 2024, as CMS published it. Medicare Part D only: what they prescribed outside it is not here.

38

Claims

Prescriptions and refills billed to Part D, as CMS counts them.

$8,728

Total drug cost

What Part D, the plan and the patient paid together. Not what this provider was paid — they are paid nothing out of it.

not reported

Beneficiaries

People with at least one prescription from this provider.

28

Brand-name claims

Of the claims above, those for a brand-name drug.

Withheld

Generic claims

Of the claims above, those for a generic. CMS withheld this value and marked it "*". It publishes two markers and two reasons — a value between 1 and 10, or one withheld so another cannot be worked out — without saying which marker means which.

0

Opioid claims

CMS puts this provider's opioid prescribing rate at 0% of their claims. That is their figure, computed from their own unsuppressed data.

0

Antibiotic claims

Claims for an antibiotic.

Cardiology

Prescriber type

As CMS classifies this prescriber. Credentials: M.D..

A blank is not a zero. CMS withholds a value between 1 and 10, and withholds the next lowest alongside it so the first cannot be worked out by subtraction — so a withheld figure is not even evidence that the number was small. Rows for ten or fewer claims are removed from the file altogether, which is why the parts of a total can be withheld while the total is published.

Elsewhere

• Payments to doctors in Delaware — what was reported across the state this doctor practises in.
• What drug and device companies pay doctors — the national picture these figures are part of.
• This record at CMS — the publisher’s own page for this profile.
• The NPI registry — who this identifier belongs to, at CMS.