Desta Abate

What was reported, 2019–2025

$96

General payments

1 separate payment. What they were, as CMS records them, is below.

$0

Research payments

Funding for a study, usually paid to an institution with this clinician named on it. Not added to general payments, and not income.

$0

Ownership and investment

The value of a stake this clinician or an immediate family member held.

0

Disputed

This clinician has contested none of the payments reported about them.

How this compares

General payments: $96, 2019–⁠2025

By the amount companies reported, 4,710th among the 6,282 profiles with general payments in Gerontology.

General payments: this profile's rank in each group, its place among the profiles nationally and its share of the national total

Nationally	1,251,274th of 1,688,859
In North Carolina	40,878th of 55,762
In Gerontology	4,710th of 6,282
Profiles below it nationally	More than 25%
Share of the national total	< 0.1%

What the payments were

Each payment as the manufacturer categorized it when reporting it to CMS, across 2019–2025. Together they are the general payments above. A category is the reporter’s, and nothing in the record says a payment in any of them was improper.

By program year

CMS reports a program year at a time and also publishes its own total across them, which is what the figures above are. These rows are that total taken apart, not a second set of payments.

CMS’s file covers 2019–2025. It holds no payments to Desta Abate in 2019–2021 and 2023–2025.

The record

National Provider Identifier

1003482662

The identifier this page is addressed by, and the one both CMS files share.

Specialty

Gerontology

Physician Assistants & Advanced Practice Nursing Providers, in CMS's taxonomy.

Licensed in

NC

The state of the license CMS lists first.

Recipient type

Covered Recipient Non-Physician Practitioner

How CMS classifies the recipient of these payments.

Medicare prescribing

What this provider billed to Medicare Part D in 2024, as CMS published it. Medicare Part D only: what they prescribed outside it is not here.

405

Claims

Prescriptions and refills billed to Part D, as CMS counts them.

$11,697

Total drug cost

What Part D, the plan and the patient paid together. Not what this provider was paid — they are paid nothing out of it.

31

Beneficiaries

People with at least one prescription from this provider.

29

Brand-name claims

Of the claims above, those for a brand-name drug.

376

Generic claims

Of the claims above, those for a generic.

not reported

Opioid claims

Claims for an opioid. CMS published no figure for this provider, and there is no suppression marker on this measure — so this is an absent figure rather than a withheld one, and it is not a zero.

0

Antibiotic claims

Claims for an antibiotic.

Nurse Practitioner

Prescriber type

As CMS classifies this prescriber.

A blank is not a zero. CMS withholds a value between 1 and 10, and withholds the next lowest alongside it so the first cannot be worked out by subtraction — so a withheld figure is not even evidence that the number was small. Rows for ten or fewer claims are removed from the file altogether, which is why the parts of a total can be withheld while the total is published.

Elsewhere

• Payments to doctors in North Carolina — what was reported across the state this clinician practises in.
• What drug and device companies pay doctors — the national picture these figures are part of.
• This record at CMS — the publisher’s own page for this profile.
• The NPI registry — who this identifier belongs to, at CMS.