Lucas Wong

What was reported, 2019–2025

$10,575

General payments

112 separate payments. What they were, as CMS records them, is below.

$202

Research payments

Funding for a study, usually paid to an institution with this doctor named on it. Not added to general payments, and not income.

$0

Ownership and investment

The value of a stake this doctor or an immediate family member held.

0

Disputed

This doctor has contested none of the payments reported about them.

How this compares

General payments: $10,575, 2019–⁠2025

By the amount companies reported, ranks 105,237th of 1,688,859 profiles with general payments nationally, 9,196th of 135,300 in Texas and 3,199th of 11,988 in Hematology & Oncology. More than 93% of the 1,688,859 profiles with general payments nationally. It is < 0.1% of the $17,307,111,322 reported nationally.

Research payments: $202, 2019–⁠2025

By the amount companies reported, ranks 19,685th of 22,827 profiles named on research payments nationally, 1,589th of 1,889 in Texas and 1,299th of 1,404 in Hematology & Oncology. More than 13% of the 22,827 profiles named on research payments nationally. It is < 0.1% of the $610,582,922 reported nationally.

What the payments were

Each payment as the manufacturer categorized it when reporting it to CMS, across 2019–2025. Together they are the general payments above. A category is the reporter’s, and nothing in the record says a payment in any of them was improper.

By program year

CMS reports a program year at a time and also publishes its own total across them, which is what the figures above are. These rows are that total taken apart, not a second set of payments.

The record

National Provider Identifier

1639131048

The identifier this page is addressed by, and the one both CMS files share.

Specialty

Hematology & Oncology

Allopathic & Osteopathic Physicians, in CMS's taxonomy.

Licensed in

TX

The state of the license CMS lists first.

Recipient type

Covered Recipient Physician

How CMS classifies the recipient of these payments.

Medicare prescribing

What this provider billed to Medicare Part D in 2024, as CMS published it. Medicare Part D only: what they prescribed outside it is not here.

370

Claims

Prescriptions and refills billed to Part D, as CMS counts them.

$691,532

Total drug cost

What Part D, the plan and the patient paid together. Not what this provider was paid — they are paid nothing out of it.

103

Beneficiaries

People with at least one prescription from this provider.

57

Brand-name claims

Of the claims above, those for a brand-name drug.

313

Generic claims

Of the claims above, those for a generic.

48

Opioid claims

CMS puts this provider's opioid prescribing rate at 12.972972972972974% of their claims. That is their figure, computed from their own unsuppressed data.

12

Antibiotic claims

Claims for an antibiotic.

Internal Medicine

Prescriber type

As CMS classifies this prescriber. Credentials: M.D..

A blank is not a zero. CMS withholds a value between 1 and 10, and withholds the next lowest alongside it so the first cannot be worked out by subtraction — so a withheld figure is not even evidence that the number was small. Rows for ten or fewer claims are removed from the file altogether, which is why the parts of a total can be withheld while the total is published.

Elsewhere

• Payments to doctors in Texas — what was reported across the state this doctor practises in.
• What drug and device companies pay doctors — the national picture these figures are part of.
• This record at CMS — the publisher’s own page for this profile.
• The NPI registry — who this identifier belongs to, at CMS.