Gemo Wong

What was reported, 2019–2025

$472

General payments

29 separate payments. CMS’s record for this profile, linked below, lists the kind of each.

$0

Research payments

Funding for a study, usually paid to an institution with this doctor named on it. Not added to general payments, and not income.

$0

Ownership and investment

The value of a stake this doctor or an immediate family member held.

0

Disputed

This doctor has contested none of the payments reported about them.

CMS records that this person may appear in Open Payments under more than one profile. The figures above are the profile it holds the most money against; money reported under another profile is not in them. That is the publisher’s own caveat about its own record, and it is why this page does not describe these totals as everything this doctor was paid.

How this compares

General payments: $472, 2019–⁠2025

By the amount companies reported, ranks 748,514th of 1,688,859 profiles with general payments nationally, 27,681st of 64,648 in Illinois and 3,022nd of 9,540 in General Practice. More than 55% of the 1,688,859 profiles with general payments nationally. It is < 0.1% of the $17,307,111,322 reported nationally.

By program year

CMS reports a program year at a time and also publishes its own total across them, which is what the figures above are. These rows are that total taken apart, not a second set of payments.

CMS’s file covers 2019–2025. It holds no payments to Gemo Wong in 2021–2025.

The record

National Provider Identifier

1033118625

The identifier this page is addressed by, and the one both CMS files share.

Specialty

General Practice

Allopathic & Osteopathic Physicians, in CMS's taxonomy.

Licensed in

IL

The state of the license CMS lists first.

Recipient type

Covered Recipient Physician

How CMS classifies the recipient of these payments.

Medicare prescribing

CMS holds no Part D record for NPI 1033118625 in the most recent year we hold, and that has two readings it does not distinguish between: this provider billed Medicare Part D for nothing that year, or they billed it for ten claims or fewer, which CMS removes from the file before publishing to protect the patients behind them. It does not mean the data is missing, and it does not mean this provider writes no prescriptions — anything paid for privately, by Medicaid, or by a patient is not in this file at all.

Elsewhere

• Payments to doctors in Illinois — what was reported across the state this doctor practises in.
• What drug and device companies pay doctors — the national picture these figures are part of.
• This record at CMS — the publisher’s own page for this profile.
• The NPI registry — who this identifier belongs to, at CMS.