Skip to content

Johnson City Public Library

Johnson City, TN. EIN 62-0581531. Reported $2,662,128 of revenue for 2024 on its Form 990.

The IRS record

Registered name
JOHNSON CITY PUBLIC LIBRARY
As the IRS records it, which is how it appears in their own search.
Employer Identification Number
62-0581531
The identifier the IRS uses for this organization.
Recognized under
501(c)(3) — charitable, religious, educational, scientific
The subsection of the code its exemption was granted under.
Recognized in
1991
The year of the IRS ruling.
Classification
Education
NTEE code B71Z, assigned at registration.
Gifts to it
Contributions are deductible
Whether the IRS treats a contribution to this organization as deductible.
Legal form
Corporation
How the organization is constituted, as recorded at registration.
Location of record
Johnson City, TN
The address the IRS holds, not necessarily where it operates.
Most recent filing
Form 990
For tax year 2024.

What it reported for 2024

$2.7 million
Total revenue
$2,662,128
Contributions, grants, program service revenue and investment income.
$2.6 million
Total expenses
$2,550,023
As reported on the return.
$2.6 million
Total assets, book value
$2,643,628
At the end of the year, at what the organization paid for them.
10
People listed
Officers, directors, trustees, key employees and highest-paid employees.
$109.5 thousand
Largest reported compensation
$109,457
Reported for Julia Turpin.

Similar organizations

Other organizations in the same state and category as Johnson City Public Library
OrganizationRevenue
Vanderbilt University$2,818,556,976
Belmont University$579,470,406
Lincoln Memorial University$285,223,229
University of the South$246,056,453
Meharry Medical College$234,140,557
The University of Tennessee Foundat Ion Inc$211,789,117

This organization elsewhere

More in Tennessee and under Education. All organizations: nonprofits.

What this page cannot show

  • Everything here is what the organization told the IRS about itself. The IRS publishes returns as filed and does not audit them first.
  • The figures describe the most recent year on record, which is usually one to two years behind, and not the organization’s current position.
  • Nothing here says whether the organization does its work well, or how it spends what it raises beyond the totals on the form.

Something wrong? Tell us. Full method at methodology.

Sources

Data retrieved