Julie Woodall-Smith

What was reported, 2019–2025

$38

General payments

2 separate payments. What they were, as CMS records them, is below.

$0

Research payments

Funding for a study, usually paid to an institution with this doctor named on it. Not added to general payments, and not income.

$0

Ownership and investment

The value of a stake this doctor or an immediate family member held.

0

Disputed

This doctor has contested none of the payments reported about them.

How this compares

General payments: $38, 2019–⁠2025

By the amount companies reported, ranks 1,451,336th of 1,688,859 profiles with general payments nationally, 16,756th of 21,301 in Minnesota and 87,675th of 101,255 in Physician Assistant. More than 14% of the 1,688,859 profiles with general payments nationally. It is < 0.1% of the $17,307,111,322 reported nationally.

What the payments were

Each payment as the manufacturer categorized it when reporting it to CMS, across 2019–2025. Together they are the general payments above. A category is the reporter’s, and nothing in the record says a payment in any of them was improper.

By program year

CMS reports a program year at a time and also publishes its own total across them, which is what the figures above are. These rows are that total taken apart, not a second set of payments.

CMS’s file covers 2019–2025. It holds no payments to Julie Woodall-Smith in 2019–2023.

The record

National Provider Identifier

1396729034

The identifier this page is addressed by, and the one both CMS files share.

Specialty

Physician Assistant

Physician Assistants & Advanced Practice Nursing Providers, in CMS's taxonomy.

Licensed in

MN

The state of the license CMS lists first.

Recipient type

Covered Recipient Non-Physician Practitioner

How CMS classifies the recipient of these payments.

Medicare prescribing

What this provider billed to Medicare Part D in 2024, as CMS published it. Medicare Part D only: what they prescribed outside it is not here.

305

Claims

Prescriptions and refills billed to Part D, as CMS counts them.

$10,583

Total drug cost

What Part D, the plan and the patient paid together. Not what this provider was paid — they are paid nothing out of it.

138

Beneficiaries

People with at least one prescription from this provider.

Withheld

Brand-name claims

Of the claims above, those for a brand-name drug. CMS withheld this value and marked it "#". It publishes two markers and two reasons — a value between 1 and 10, or one withheld so another cannot be worked out — without saying which marker means which.

279

Generic claims

Of the claims above, those for a generic.

not reported

Opioid claims

Claims for an opioid. CMS published no figure for this provider, and there is no suppression marker on this measure — so this is an absent figure rather than a withheld one, and it is not a zero.

80

Antibiotic claims

Claims for an antibiotic.

Physician Assistant

Prescriber type

As CMS classifies this prescriber. Credentials: PA.

A blank is not a zero. CMS withholds a value between 1 and 10, and withholds the next lowest alongside it so the first cannot be worked out by subtraction — so a withheld figure is not even evidence that the number was small. Rows for ten or fewer claims are removed from the file altogether, which is why the parts of a total can be withheld while the total is published.

Elsewhere

• Payments to doctors in Minnesota — what was reported across the state this doctor practises in.
• What drug and device companies pay doctors — the national picture these figures are part of.
• This record at CMS — the publisher’s own page for this profile.
• The NPI registry — who this identifier belongs to, at CMS.