Skip to content

Flying Dog Foundation

Piscataway, NJ. EIN 84-3722623. Reported $54,862 of revenue for 2025 on its Form 990-EZ.

The IRS record

Registered name
FLYING DOG FOUNDATION
As the IRS records it, which is how it appears in their own search.
Employer Identification Number
84-3722623
The identifier the IRS uses for this organization.
Recognized under
501(c)(3) — charitable, religious, educational, scientific
The subsection of the code its exemption was granted under.
Recognized in
2020
The year of the IRS ruling.
Classification
Animal-Related
NTEE code D12, assigned at registration.
Gifts to it
Contributions are deductible
Whether the IRS treats a contribution to this organization as deductible.
Legal form
Corporation
How the organization is constituted, as recorded at registration.
Location of record
Piscataway, NJ
The address the IRS holds, not necessarily where it operates.
Most recent filing
Form 990-EZ
For tax year 2025.

What it reported for 2025

$54,862
Total revenue
Contributions, grants, program service revenue and investment income.
$8,155
Total expenses
As reported on the return.
$7,718
Total assets, book value
At the end of the year, at what the organization paid for them.
0
People listed
Officers, directors, trustees, key employees and highest-paid employees.
not reported
Largest reported compensation
This organization reported paying nobody it listed.

Similar organizations

Other organizations in the same state and category as Flying Dog Foundation
OrganizationRevenue
Associated Humane Societies Inc$10,532,486
Monmouth County Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals$9,442,682
People for Animals Inc$5,379,140
Animal Welfare Association Incorporated$4,554,360
Homeward Bound Pet Adoption Center Inc$3,730,947
Paws on Death Row Inc$3,448,115

This organization elsewhere

More in New Jersey and under Animal-Related. All organizations: nonprofits.

What this page cannot show

  • Everything here is what the organization told the IRS about itself. The IRS publishes returns as filed and does not audit them first.
  • The figures describe the most recent year on record, which is usually one to two years behind, and not the organization’s current position.
  • Nothing here says whether the organization does its work well, or how it spends what it raises beyond the totals on the form.

Something wrong? Tell us. Full method at methodology.

Sources

Data retrieved