Skip to content

Eco Fab Corp

Cresskill, NJ. EIN 93-2707989. Reported $8,000 of revenue for 2024 on its Form 990-EZ.

The IRS record

Registered name
ECO FAB CORP
As the IRS records it, which is how it appears in their own search.
Employer Identification Number
93-2707989
The identifier the IRS uses for this organization.
Recognized under
501(c)(3) — charitable, religious, educational, scientific
The subsection of the code its exemption was granted under.
Recognized in
2023
The year of the IRS ruling.
Classification
Environment
NTEE code C60, assigned at registration.
Gifts to it
Contributions are deductible
Whether the IRS treats a contribution to this organization as deductible.
Legal form
Corporation
How the organization is constituted, as recorded at registration.
Location of record
Cresskill, NJ
The address the IRS holds, not necessarily where it operates.
Most recent filing
Form 990-EZ
For tax year 2024.

What it reported for 2024

$8,000
Total revenue
Contributions, grants, program service revenue and investment income.
$5,033
Total expenses
As reported on the return.
$2,967
Total assets, book value
At the end of the year, at what the organization paid for them.
0
People listed
Officers, directors, trustees, key employees and highest-paid employees.
not reported
Largest reported compensation
This organization reported paying nobody it listed.

Similar organizations

Other organizations in the same state and category as Eco Fab Corp
OrganizationRevenue
Duke Farms Foundation$16,859,159
Childrens Health Defense$15,234,096
New Jersey Audubon Society$8,469,012
Hourglass Climate Inc$7,558,411
American Littoral Society$6,936,666
New Jersey Conservation Foundation$6,233,164

This organization elsewhere

More in New Jersey and under Environment. All organizations: nonprofits.

What this page cannot show

  • Everything here is what the organization told the IRS about itself. The IRS publishes returns as filed and does not audit them first.
  • The figures describe the most recent year on record, which is usually one to two years behind, and not the organization’s current position.
  • Nothing here says whether the organization does its work well, or how it spends what it raises beyond the totals on the form.

Something wrong? Tell us. Full method at methodology.

Sources

Data retrieved