Skip to content
American Factbook
Menu

Stanwood Elementary Pto

Stanwood, WA. EIN 91-1557785. Reported $62,318 of revenue for 2025 on its Form 990-EZ.

The IRS record

Registered name
STANWOOD ELEMENTARY PTO
As the IRS records it, which is how it appears in their own search.
Employer Identification Number
91-1557785
The identifier the IRS uses for this organization.
Recognized under
501(c)(3) — charitable, religious, educational, scientific
The subsection of the code its exemption was granted under.
Recognized in
1997
The year of the IRS ruling.
Classification
Education
NTEE code B94, assigned at registration.
Gifts to it
Contributions are deductible
Whether the IRS treats a contribution to this organization as deductible.
Legal form
Corporation
How the organization is constituted, as recorded at registration.
Location of record
Stanwood, WA
The address the IRS holds, not necessarily where it operates.
Most recent filing
Form 990-EZ
For tax year 2025.

What it reported for 2025

$62,318
Total revenue
Contributions, grants, program service revenue and investment income.
$56,328
Total expenses
As reported on the return.
$39,199
Total assets, book value
At the end of the year, at what the organization paid for them.
0
People listed
Officers, directors, trustees, key employees and highest-paid employees.
not reported
Largest reported compensation
This organization reported paying nobody it listed.

Similar organizations

Other organizations in the same state and category as Stanwood Elementary Pto
OrganizationRevenue
Corporation of Gonzaga University$508,869,741
Association of University Physicians$415,152,809
University of Washington Foundation$193,782,030
Whitman College Board of Trustees$169,289,094
Pacific Lutheran University Inc$157,869,351
Whitworth University$146,768,884

This organization elsewhere

More in Washington and under Education. All organizations: nonprofits.

What this page cannot show

  • Everything here is what the organization told the IRS about itself. The IRS publishes returns as filed and does not audit them first.
  • The figures describe the most recent year on record, which is usually one to two years behind, and not the organization’s current position.
  • Nothing here says whether the organization does its work well, or how it spends what it raises beyond the totals on the form.

Something wrong? Tell us. Full method at methodology.

Sources

Data retrieved