Skip to content
American Factbook
Menu

Nutrition First

Seattle, WA. EIN 91-1387596. Reported $110,334 of revenue for 2025 on its Form 990-EZ.

American Factbook Research

The IRS record

NUTRITION FIRST
Registered name
As the IRS records it, which is how it appears in their own search.
91-1387596
Employer Identification Number
The identifier the IRS uses for this organization.
501(c)(3) — charitable, religious, educational, scientific
Recognised under
The subsection of the code its exemption was granted under.
1992
Recognised in
The year of the IRS ruling.
Human Services
Classification
NTEE code P020, assigned at registration.
Contributions are deductible
Gifts to it
Whether the IRS treats a contribution to this organization as deductible.
Corporation
Legal form
How the organization is constituted, as recorded at registration.
Seattle, WA
Location of record
The address the IRS holds, not necessarily where it operates.
Form 990-EZ
Most recent filing
For tax year 2025.

What it reported for 2025

$110,334
Total revenue
Contributions, grants, program service revenue and investment income.
$97,978
Total expenses
As reported on the return.
$128,904
Total assets, book value
At the end of the year, at what the organization paid for them.
10
People listed
Officers, directors, trustees, key employees and highest-paid employees.
$55,645
Largest reported compensation
Reported for NICOLE FLATEBOE.

Nutrition First reported paying NICOLE FLATEBOE, Executive Dir., $55,645 for 2025. That is reportable compensation from the organization, from related organizations, and other compensation, as the organization reported all three. It is not a verified salary and not take-home pay.

Similar organizations

This organization elsewhere

More in Washington and under Human Services. All organizations: nonprofits.

What this page cannot show

  • Everything here is what the organization told the IRS about itself. The IRS publishes returns as filed and does not audit them first.
  • The figures describe the most recent year on record, which is usually one to two years behind, and not the organization’s current position.
  • Nothing here says whether the organization does its work well, or how it spends what it raises beyond the totals on the form.

Something wrong? Tell us. Full method at methodology.

Sources

Data retrieved