Skip to content

Utah Ranked Choice Voting Action

Heber, UT. EIN 84-1727261. Reported $55,000 of revenue for 2024 on its Form 990-EZ.

The IRS record

Registered name
UTAH RANKED CHOICE VOTING ACTION
As the IRS records it, which is how it appears in their own search.
Employer Identification Number
84-1727261
The identifier the IRS uses for this organization.
Recognized under
501(c)(4) — civic league or social welfare organization
The subsection of the code its exemption was granted under.
Recognized in
2019
The year of the IRS ruling.
Classification
Civil Rights, Social Action and Advocacy
NTEE code R01, assigned at registration.
Gifts to it
Contributions are not deductible
Whether the IRS treats a contribution to this organization as deductible.
Legal form
Association
How the organization is constituted, as recorded at registration.
Location of record
Heber, UT
The address the IRS holds, not necessarily where it operates.
Most recent filing
Form 990-EZ
For tax year 2024.

What it reported for 2024

$55,000
Total revenue
Contributions, grants, program service revenue and investment income.
$59,197
Total expenses
As reported on the return.
$3,066
Total assets, book value
At the end of the year, at what the organization paid for them.
0
People listed
Officers, directors, trustees, key employees and highest-paid employees.
not reported
Largest reported compensation
This organization reported paying nobody it listed.

Similar organizations

Other organizations in the same state and category as Utah Ranked Choice Voting Action
OrganizationRevenue
Foundation for Constitutional Freedom$2,975,100
Utah Children$1,653,127
Equality Utah Foundation$1,090,324
Rocky Mountain Innocence Center$895,567
Moab Valley Multicultural Center$799,073
Better Utah Institute$731,612

This organization elsewhere

More in Utah and under Civil Rights, Social Action and Advocacy. All organizations: nonprofits.

What this page cannot show

  • Everything here is what the organization told the IRS about itself. The IRS publishes returns as filed and does not audit them first.
  • The figures describe the most recent year on record, which is usually one to two years behind, and not the organization’s current position.
  • Nothing here says whether the organization does its work well, or how it spends what it raises beyond the totals on the form.

Something wrong? Tell us. Full method at methodology.

Sources

Data retrieved