Skip to content

Manhattan 2 Group Inc

Newton, MA. EIN 83-4498716. Reported $104,516 of revenue for 2024 on its Form 990.

The IRS record

Registered name
MANHATTAN 2 GROUP INC
As the IRS records it, which is how it appears in their own search.
Employer Identification Number
83-4498716
The identifier the IRS uses for this organization.
Recognized under
501(c)(3) — charitable, religious, educational, scientific
The subsection of the code its exemption was granted under.
Recognized in
2019
The year of the IRS ruling.
Classification
Science and Technology
NTEE code U05, assigned at registration.
Gifts to it
Contributions are deductible
Whether the IRS treats a contribution to this organization as deductible.
Legal form
Corporation
How the organization is constituted, as recorded at registration.
Location of record
Newton, MA
The address the IRS holds, not necessarily where it operates.
Most recent filing
Form 990
For tax year 2024.

What it reported for 2024

$104.5 thousand
Total revenue
$104,516
Contributions, grants, program service revenue and investment income.
$62.2 thousand
Total expenses
$62,161
As reported on the return.
$173.6 thousand
Total assets, book value
$173,603
At the end of the year, at what the organization paid for them.
0
People listed
Officers, directors, trustees, key employees and highest-paid employees.
not reported
Largest reported compensation
This organization reported paying nobody it listed.

Similar organizations

Other organizations in the same state and category as Manhattan 2 Group Inc
OrganizationRevenue
The MITRE Corporation$2,475,879,129
Charles Stark Draper Laboratory Inc$949,348,102
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution$344,338,772
Convergent Research Inc$72,426,908
Marine Biological Laboratory$57,348,551
Lab Central Inc$27,342,387

This organization elsewhere

More in Massachusetts and under Science and Technology. All organizations: nonprofits.

What this page cannot show

  • Everything here is what the organization told the IRS about itself. The IRS publishes returns as filed and does not audit them first.
  • The figures describe the most recent year on record, which is usually one to two years behind, and not the organization’s current position.
  • Nothing here says whether the organization does its work well, or how it spends what it raises beyond the totals on the form.

Something wrong? Tell us. Full method at methodology.

Sources

Data retrieved