Skip to content

AL Karim Foundation

Bloomingdale, IL. EIN 83-3588452. Reported $75,178 of revenue for 2024 on its Form 990-EZ.

The IRS record

Registered name
AL KARIM FOUNDATION
As the IRS records it, which is how it appears in their own search.
Employer Identification Number
83-3588452
The identifier the IRS uses for this organization.
Recognized under
501(c)(3) — charitable, religious, educational, scientific
The subsection of the code its exemption was granted under.
Recognized in
2020
The year of the IRS ruling.
Classification
Human Services
NTEE code P60, assigned at registration.
Gifts to it
Contributions are deductible
Whether the IRS treats a contribution to this organization as deductible.
Legal form
Corporation
How the organization is constituted, as recorded at registration.
Location of record
Bloomingdale, IL
The address the IRS holds, not necessarily where it operates.
Most recent filing
Form 990-EZ
For tax year 2024.

What it reported for 2024

$75,178
Total revenue
Contributions, grants, program service revenue and investment income.
$101,938
Total expenses
As reported on the return.
$71,015
Total assets, book value
At the end of the year, at what the organization paid for them.
0
People listed
Officers, directors, trustees, key employees and highest-paid employees.
not reported
Largest reported compensation
This organization reported paying nobody it listed.

Similar organizations

Other organizations in the same state and category as AL Karim Foundation
OrganizationRevenue
Midwest Food Bank NFP Inc$579,032,442
Rush Medical Group$475,026,740
National Council of Young Mens Christian Assns of the USA$198,431,455
Illinois Network of Child Care Resource and Referral Agencies$196,245,221
Metropolitan Family Services$152,445,618
Misericordia Home$130,939,538

This organization elsewhere

More in Illinois and under Human Services. All organizations: nonprofits.

What this page cannot show

  • Everything here is what the organization told the IRS about itself. The IRS publishes returns as filed and does not audit them first.
  • The figures describe the most recent year on record, which is usually one to two years behind, and not the organization’s current position.
  • Nothing here says whether the organization does its work well, or how it spends what it raises beyond the totals on the form.

Something wrong? Tell us. Full method at methodology.

Sources

Data retrieved