Skip to content

Benefitsmn

Saint Paul, MN. EIN 83-1850611. Reported $15,325,119 of revenue for 2024 on its Form 990.

The IRS record

Registered name
BENEFITSMN
As the IRS records it, which is how it appears in their own search.
Employer Identification Number
83-1850611
The identifier the IRS uses for this organization.
Recognized under
501(c)(9) — voluntary employees’ beneficiary association
The subsection of the code its exemption was granted under.
Recognized in
2020
The year of the IRS ruling.
Classification
Mutual and Membership Benefit
NTEE code Y44, assigned at registration.
Gifts to it
Contributions are not deductible
Whether the IRS treats a contribution to this organization as deductible.
Legal form
Trust
How the organization is constituted, as recorded at registration.
Location of record
Saint Paul, MN
The address the IRS holds, not necessarily where it operates.
Most recent filing
Form 990
For tax year 2024.

What it reported for 2024

$15,325,119
Total revenue
Contributions, grants, program service revenue and investment income.
$15,285,199
Total expenses
As reported on the return.
$82,451
Total assets, book value
At the end of the year, at what the organization paid for them.
9
People listed
Officers, directors, trustees, key employees and highest-paid employees.
$176,900
Largest reported compensation
Reported for Karla Schiller.

Benefitsmn reported paying Karla Schiller, Trustee, $176,900 for 2024, listed as a trustee or director. That is reportable compensation from the organization, from related organizations, and other compensation, as the organization reported all three. It is not a verified salary and not take-home pay.

Similar organizations

This organization elsewhere

More in Minnesota and under Mutual and Membership Benefit. All organizations: nonprofits.

What this page cannot show

  • Everything here is what the organization told the IRS about itself. The IRS publishes returns as filed and does not audit them first.
  • The figures describe the most recent year on record, which is usually one to two years behind, and not the organization’s current position.
  • Nothing here says whether the organization does its work well, or how it spends what it raises beyond the totals on the form.

Something wrong? Tell us. Full method at methodology.

Sources

Data retrieved