Skip to content

Game to Grow

Seattle, WA. EIN 82-1306872. Reported $229,354 of revenue for 2024 on its Form 990.

The IRS record

Registered name
GAME TO GROW
As the IRS records it, which is how it appears in their own search.
Employer Identification Number
82-1306872
The identifier the IRS uses for this organization.
Recognized under
501(c)(3) — charitable, religious, educational, scientific
The subsection of the code its exemption was granted under.
Recognized in
2018
The year of the IRS ruling.
Classification
Human Services
NTEE code P19, assigned at registration.
Gifts to it
Contributions are deductible
Whether the IRS treats a contribution to this organization as deductible.
Legal form
Corporation
How the organization is constituted, as recorded at registration.
Location of record
Seattle, WA
The address the IRS holds, not necessarily where it operates.
Most recent filing
Form 990
For tax year 2024.

What it reported for 2024

$229.4 thousand
Total revenue
$229,354
Contributions, grants, program service revenue and investment income.
$222.8 thousand
Total expenses
$222,823
As reported on the return.
$113.6 thousand
Total assets, book value
$113,631
At the end of the year, at what the organization paid for them.
4
People listed
Officers, directors, trustees, key employees and highest-paid employees.
$65,664
Largest reported compensation
Reported for Adam Davis.

Game to Grow reported paying Adam Davis, Executive Dir., $65,664 for 2024, listed as a officer. That is reportable compensation from the organization, from related organizations, and other compensation, as the organization reported all three. It is not a verified salary and not take-home pay.

Similar organizations

This organization elsewhere

More in Washington and under Human Services. All organizations: nonprofits.

What this page cannot show

  • Everything here is what the organization told the IRS about itself. The IRS publishes returns as filed and does not audit them first.
  • The figures describe the most recent year on record, which is usually one to two years behind, and not the organization’s current position.
  • Nothing here says whether the organization does its work well, or how it spends what it raises beyond the totals on the form.

Something wrong? Tell us. Full method at methodology.

Sources

Data retrieved