Skip to content

Oklahoma Genetics Inc

Stillwater, OK. EIN 73-1728055. Reported $2,204,800 of revenue for 2025 on its Form 990.

The IRS record

Registered name
OKLAHOMA GENETICS INC
As the IRS records it, which is how it appears in their own search.
Employer Identification Number
73-1728055
The identifier the IRS uses for this organization.
Recognized under
501(c)(5) — labor, agricultural or horticultural organization
The subsection of the code its exemption was granted under.
Recognized in
2007
The year of the IRS ruling.
Classification
Food, Agriculture and Nutrition
NTEE code K05, assigned at registration.
Gifts to it
Contributions are not deductible
Whether the IRS treats a contribution to this organization as deductible.
Legal form
Corporation
How the organization is constituted, as recorded at registration.
Location of record
Stillwater, OK
The address the IRS holds, not necessarily where it operates.
Most recent filing
Form 990
For tax year 2025.

What it reported for 2025

$2,204,800
Total revenue
Contributions, grants, program service revenue and investment income.
$1,527,329
Total expenses
As reported on the return.
$2,790,269
Total assets, book value
At the end of the year, at what the organization paid for them.
0
People listed
Officers, directors, trustees, key employees and highest-paid employees.
not reported
Largest reported compensation
This organization reported paying nobody it listed.

Similar organizations

Other organizations in the same state and category as Oklahoma Genetics Inc
OrganizationRevenue
Regional Food Bank of Oklahoma$121,256,625
Community Food Bank of Eastern Oklahoma Inc$61,142,099
Oklahoma State Fair Inc$25,689,593
Hunger Free Oklahoma Inc$22,730,173
National Reining Horse Association$15,531,421
Impact Catering Co$7,994,009

This organization elsewhere

More in Oklahoma and under Food, Agriculture and Nutrition. All organizations: nonprofits.

What this page cannot show

  • Everything here is what the organization told the IRS about itself. The IRS publishes returns as filed and does not audit them first.
  • The figures describe the most recent year on record, which is usually one to two years behind, and not the organization’s current position.
  • Nothing here says whether the organization does its work well, or how it spends what it raises beyond the totals on the form.

Something wrong? Tell us. Full method at methodology.

Sources

Data retrieved