Skip to content

Simpson Water Association

Weir, MS. EIN 64-0688170. Reported $318,280 of revenue for 2025 on its Form 990.

The IRS record

Registered name
SIMPSON WATER ASSOCIATION
As the IRS records it, which is how it appears in their own search.
Employer Identification Number
64-0688170
The identifier the IRS uses for this organization.
Recognized under
501(c)(12) — mutual utility or benevolent life insurance association
The subsection of the code its exemption was granted under.
Recognized in
2011
The year of the IRS ruling.
Classification
Mutual and Membership Benefit
NTEE code Y22, assigned at registration.
Gifts to it
Contributions are not deductible
Whether the IRS treats a contribution to this organization as deductible.
Legal form
Corporation
How the organization is constituted, as recorded at registration.
Location of record
Weir, MS
The address the IRS holds, not necessarily where it operates.
Most recent filing
Form 990
For tax year 2025.

What it reported for 2025

$318,280
Total revenue
Contributions, grants, program service revenue and investment income.
$256,937
Total expenses
As reported on the return.
$1,365,253
Total assets, book value
At the end of the year, at what the organization paid for them.
0
People listed
Officers, directors, trustees, key employees and highest-paid employees.
not reported
Largest reported compensation
This organization reported paying nobody it listed.

Similar organizations

Other organizations in the same state and category as Simpson Water Association
OrganizationRevenue
Ecm Group Health Trust$33,547,575
High Hill Water Association$2,611,422
Lexie Water Association Inc$1,773,818
West Marion Water Association Inc$1,756,343
Oktoc Water Association Inc$1,746,477
Carnes Utility Association Inc$1,739,857

This organization elsewhere

More in Mississippi and under Mutual and Membership Benefit. All organizations: nonprofits.

What this page cannot show

  • Everything here is what the organization told the IRS about itself. The IRS publishes returns as filed and does not audit them first.
  • The figures describe the most recent year on record, which is usually one to two years behind, and not the organization’s current position.
  • Nothing here says whether the organization does its work well, or how it spends what it raises beyond the totals on the form.

Something wrong? Tell us. Full method at methodology.

Sources

Data retrieved