Skip to content

PROJECT NOAH INC

BOWLING GREEN, KY. EIN 61-1320740. Reported $75,475 of revenue for 2023 on its Form 990.

American Factbook Research

The IRS record

61-1320740
Employer Identification Number
The identifier the IRS uses for this organization.
501(c)(3) — charitable, religious, educational, scientific
Recognised under
The subsection of the code its exemption was granted under.
2012
Recognised in
The year of the IRS ruling.
Animal-Related
Classification
NTEE code D34, assigned at registration.
Contributions are deductible
Gifts to it
Whether the IRS treats a contribution to this organization as deductible.
Corporation
Legal form
How the organization is constituted, as recorded at registration.
BOWLING GREEN, KY
Location of record
The address the IRS holds, not necessarily where it operates.
Form 990
Most recent filing
For tax year 2023.

What it reported for 2023

$75,475
Total revenue
Contributions, grants, program service revenue and investment income.
$30,000
Total expenses
As reported on the return.
$45,032
Total assets, book value
At the end of the year, at what the organization paid for them.
0
People listed
Officers, directors, trustees, key employees and highest-paid employees.
not reported
Largest reported compensation
This organization reported paying nobody it listed.

Similar organizations

Other organizations in the same state and category as PROJECT NOAH INC
OrganizationRevenue
KENTUCKY HUMANE SOCIETY$17,942,670
THOROUGHBRED AFTERCARE ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC$6,716,093
LEXINGTON HUMANE SOCIETY$6,578,731
NEW VOCATION RACEHORSE ADOPTION PROGRAM$6,275,170
OLD FRIENDS INC$5,150,036
BOWLING GREEN-WARREN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$4,161,625

This organization elsewhere

More in Kentucky and under Animal-Related. All organizations: nonprofits.

What this page cannot show

  • Everything here is what the organization told the IRS about itself. The IRS publishes returns as filed and does not audit them first.
  • The figures describe the most recent year on record, which is usually one to two years behind, and not the organization’s current position.
  • Nothing here says whether the organization does its work well, or how it spends what it raises beyond the totals on the form.

Something wrong? Tell us. Full method at methodology.

Sources

Data retrieved