Skip to content
American Factbook
Menu

Nica Impact

Vancouver, WA. EIN 54-2099272. Reported $66,066 of revenue for 2025 on its Form 990.

The IRS record

Registered name
NICA IMPACT
As the IRS records it, which is how it appears in their own search.
Employer Identification Number
54-2099272
The identifier the IRS uses for this organization.
Recognized under
501(c)(3) — charitable, religious, educational, scientific
The subsection of the code its exemption was granted under.
Recognized in
2007
The year of the IRS ruling.
Classification
International, Foreign Affairs and National Security
NTEE code Q330, assigned at registration.
Gifts to it
Contributions are deductible
Whether the IRS treats a contribution to this organization as deductible.
Legal form
Corporation
How the organization is constituted, as recorded at registration.
Location of record
Vancouver, WA
The address the IRS holds, not necessarily where it operates.
Most recent filing
Form 990
For tax year 2025.

What it reported for 2025

$66,066
Total revenue
Contributions, grants, program service revenue and investment income.
$50,516
Total expenses
As reported on the return.
$530,731
Total assets, book value
At the end of the year, at what the organization paid for them.
0
People listed
Officers, directors, trustees, key employees and highest-paid employees.
not reported
Largest reported compensation
This organization reported paying nobody it listed.

Similar organizations

Other organizations in the same state and category as Nica Impact
OrganizationRevenue
World Vision$1,423,305,144
Path$353,538,888
Panorama Global$63,496,064
Inkomoko$15,906,753
Making a Difference Foundation$13,583,342
Binaytara$10,169,877

This organization elsewhere

More in Washington and under International, Foreign Affairs and National Security. All organizations: nonprofits.

What this page cannot show

  • Everything here is what the organization told the IRS about itself. The IRS publishes returns as filed and does not audit them first.
  • The figures describe the most recent year on record, which is usually one to two years behind, and not the organization’s current position.
  • Nothing here says whether the organization does its work well, or how it spends what it raises beyond the totals on the form.

Something wrong? Tell us. Full method at methodology.

Sources

Data retrieved