Skip to content

Neuromuscular Study Group Inc

Kansas City, KS. EIN 47-4456205. Reported $588,959 of revenue for 2024 on its Form 990.

The IRS record

Registered name
NEUROMUSCULAR STUDY GROUP INC
As the IRS records it, which is how it appears in their own search.
Employer Identification Number
47-4456205
The identifier the IRS uses for this organization.
Recognized under
501(c)(3) — charitable, religious, educational, scientific
The subsection of the code its exemption was granted under.
Recognized in
2019
The year of the IRS ruling.
Classification
Medical Research
NTEE code H50, assigned at registration.
Gifts to it
Contributions are deductible
Whether the IRS treats a contribution to this organization as deductible.
Legal form
Corporation
How the organization is constituted, as recorded at registration.
Location of record
Kansas City, KS
The address the IRS holds, not necessarily where it operates.
Most recent filing
Form 990
For tax year 2024.

What it reported for 2024

$588,959
Total revenue
Contributions, grants, program service revenue and investment income.
$519,092
Total expenses
As reported on the return.
$530,512
Total assets, book value
At the end of the year, at what the organization paid for them.
0
People listed
Officers, directors, trustees, key employees and highest-paid employees.
not reported
Largest reported compensation
This organization reported paying nobody it listed.

Similar organizations

Other organizations in the same state and category as Neuromuscular Study Group Inc
OrganizationRevenue
Cerebral Palsy Research Foundation of Kansas Inc$7,383,451
Kansas State University Research Foundation$6,457,272
Center Industries Company Inc$5,861,345
Coming Together for a Cure Inc$4,005,322
Swine Health Information Center Inc$3,435,828
Kansas Masonic Foundation Inc$2,397,252

This organization elsewhere

More in Kansas and under Medical Research. All organizations: nonprofits.

What this page cannot show

  • Everything here is what the organization told the IRS about itself. The IRS publishes returns as filed and does not audit them first.
  • The figures describe the most recent year on record, which is usually one to two years behind, and not the organization’s current position.
  • Nothing here says whether the organization does its work well, or how it spends what it raises beyond the totals on the form.

Something wrong? Tell us. Full method at methodology.

Sources

Data retrieved