Skip to content

Resilience Partners NFP

Chicago, IL. EIN 47-3136024. Reported $1,571,264 of revenue for 2024 on its Form 990.

The IRS record

Registered name
RESILIENCE PARTNERS NFP
As the IRS records it, which is how it appears in their own search.
Employer Identification Number
47-3136024
The identifier the IRS uses for this organization.
Recognized under
501(c)(3) — charitable, religious, educational, scientific
The subsection of the code its exemption was granted under.
Recognized in
2015
The year of the IRS ruling.
Classification
Community Improvement and Capacity Building
NTEE code S02, assigned at registration.
Gifts to it
Contributions are deductible
Whether the IRS treats a contribution to this organization as deductible.
Legal form
Corporation
How the organization is constituted, as recorded at registration.
Location of record
Chicago, IL
The address the IRS holds, not necessarily where it operates.
Most recent filing
Form 990
For tax year 2024.

What it reported for 2024

$1,571,264
Total revenue
Contributions, grants, program service revenue and investment income.
$1,976,608
Total expenses
As reported on the return.
$2,092,566
Total assets, book value
At the end of the year, at what the organization paid for them.
9
People listed
Officers, directors, trustees, key employees and highest-paid employees.
$54,052
Largest reported compensation
Reported for Brittany Blackwell.

Resilience Partners NFP reported paying Brittany Blackwell, Director, $54,052 for 2024, listed as a trustee or director. That is reportable compensation from the organization, from related organizations, and other compensation, as the organization reported all three. It is not a verified salary and not take-home pay.

Similar organizations

This organization elsewhere

More in Illinois and under Community Improvement and Capacity Building. All organizations: nonprofits.

What this page cannot show

  • Everything here is what the organization told the IRS about itself. The IRS publishes returns as filed and does not audit them first.
  • The figures describe the most recent year on record, which is usually one to two years behind, and not the organization’s current position.
  • Nothing here says whether the organization does its work well, or how it spends what it raises beyond the totals on the form.

Something wrong? Tell us. Full method at methodology.

Sources

Data retrieved