Skip to content
American Factbook
Menu

Water Impact Network

Providence, UT. EIN 33-2967826. Reported $107,440 of revenue for 2025 on its Form 990-EZ.

American Factbook Research

The IRS record

WATER IMPACT NETWORK
Registered name
As the IRS records it, which is how it appears in their own search.
33-2967826
Employer Identification Number
The identifier the IRS uses for this organization.
501(c)(3) — charitable, religious, educational, scientific
Recognised under
The subsection of the code its exemption was granted under.
2025
Recognised in
The year of the IRS ruling.
Environment
Classification
NTEE code C11, assigned at registration.
Contributions are deductible
Gifts to it
Whether the IRS treats a contribution to this organization as deductible.
Corporation
Legal form
How the organization is constituted, as recorded at registration.
Providence, UT
Location of record
The address the IRS holds, not necessarily where it operates.
Form 990-EZ
Most recent filing
For tax year 2025.

What it reported for 2025

$107,440
Total revenue
Contributions, grants, program service revenue and investment income.
$90,053
Total expenses
As reported on the return.
$17,387
Total assets, book value
At the end of the year, at what the organization paid for them.
0
People listed
Officers, directors, trustees, key employees and highest-paid employees.
not reported
Largest reported compensation
This organization reported paying nobody it listed.

Similar organizations

Other organizations in the same state and category as Water Impact Network
OrganizationRevenue
Thanksgiving Point Institute Inc$99,872,507
Palladium Foundation$66,882,185
Summit Land Conservancy$22,495,539
National Energy Foundation Inc$15,102,158
Zion Natural History Association$14,094,530
Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance$12,670,430

This organization elsewhere

More in Utah and under Environment. All organizations: nonprofits.

What this page cannot show

  • Everything here is what the organization told the IRS about itself. The IRS publishes returns as filed and does not audit them first.
  • The figures describe the most recent year on record, which is usually one to two years behind, and not the organization’s current position.
  • Nothing here says whether the organization does its work well, or how it spends what it raises beyond the totals on the form.

Something wrong? Tell us. Full method at methodology.

Sources

Data retrieved