Skip to content

Oklahoma Policy Inc

Tulsa, OK. EIN 33-1178624. Reported $1,899,985 of revenue for 2024 on its Form 990.

The IRS record

Registered name
OKLAHOMA POLICY INC
As the IRS records it, which is how it appears in their own search.
Employer Identification Number
33-1178624
The identifier the IRS uses for this organization.
Recognized under
501(c)(3) — charitable, religious, educational, scientific
The subsection of the code its exemption was granted under.
Recognized in
2007
The year of the IRS ruling.
Classification
Civil Rights, Social Action and Advocacy
NTEE code R05, assigned at registration.
Gifts to it
Contributions are deductible
Whether the IRS treats a contribution to this organization as deductible.
Legal form
Corporation
How the organization is constituted, as recorded at registration.
Location of record
Tulsa, OK
The address the IRS holds, not necessarily where it operates.
Most recent filing
Form 990
For tax year 2024.

What it reported for 2024

$1.9 million
Total revenue
$1,899,985
Contributions, grants, program service revenue and investment income.
$2.1 million
Total expenses
$2,148,681
As reported on the return.
$1.5 million
Total assets, book value
$1,466,757
At the end of the year, at what the organization paid for them.
11
People listed
Officers, directors, trustees, key employees and highest-paid employees.
$136.8 thousand
Largest reported compensation
$136,776
Reported for Shiloh Kantz.

Oklahoma Policy Inc reported paying Shiloh Kantz, Executive Director, $136,776 for 2024, listed as a officer. That is reportable compensation from the organization, from related organizations, and other compensation, as the organization reported all three. It is not a verified salary and not take-home pay.

Similar organizations

This organization elsewhere

More in Oklahoma and under Civil Rights, Social Action and Advocacy. All organizations: nonprofits.

What this page cannot show

  • Everything here is what the organization told the IRS about itself. The IRS publishes returns as filed and does not audit them first.
  • The figures describe the most recent year on record, which is usually one to two years behind, and not the organization’s current position.
  • Nothing here says whether the organization does its work well, or how it spends what it raises beyond the totals on the form.

Something wrong? Tell us. Full method at methodology.

Sources

Data retrieved