Skip to content

Cibc Holding Corporation

West Redding, CT. EIN 32-0149596. Reported $96,387 of revenue for 2025 on its Form 990.

The IRS record

Registered name
CIBC HOLDING CORPORATION
As the IRS records it, which is how it appears in their own search.
Employer Identification Number
32-0149596
The identifier the IRS uses for this organization.
Recognized under
501(c)(3) — charitable, religious, educational, scientific
The subsection of the code its exemption was granted under.
Recognized in
2006
The year of the IRS ruling.
Classification
Religion-Related
NTEE code X20, assigned at registration.
Gifts to it
Contributions are deductible
Whether the IRS treats a contribution to this organization as deductible.
Legal form
Corporation
How the organization is constituted, as recorded at registration.
Location of record
West Redding, CT
The address the IRS holds, not necessarily where it operates.
Most recent filing
Form 990
For tax year 2025.

What it reported for 2025

$96,387
Total revenue
Contributions, grants, program service revenue and investment income.
$123.6 thousand
Total expenses
$123,636
As reported on the return.
$2.0 million
Total assets, book value
$1,976,259
At the end of the year, at what the organization paid for them.
0
People listed
Officers, directors, trustees, key employees and highest-paid employees.
not reported
Largest reported compensation
This organization reported paying nobody it listed.

Similar organizations

Other organizations in the same state and category as Cibc Holding Corporation
OrganizationRevenue
Jewish Foundation of Greater New Haven Inc$9,195,144
Padre Pio Foundation of America Inc$8,317,333
Metanoia Inc$7,965,588
Hillel the Foundation for Jewish Campus Life$5,705,879
Koinonia USA Inc$4,962,546
Trustees of Colt Bequest Inc$3,040,893

This organization elsewhere

More in Connecticut and under Religion-Related. All organizations: nonprofits.

What this page cannot show

  • Everything here is what the organization told the IRS about itself. The IRS publishes returns as filed and does not audit them first.
  • The figures describe the most recent year on record, which is usually one to two years behind, and not the organization’s current position.
  • Nothing here says whether the organization does its work well, or how it spends what it raises beyond the totals on the form.

Something wrong? Tell us. Full method at methodology.

Sources

Data retrieved