Skip to content
American Factbook
Menu

Coonskin Park Foundation

Charleston, WV. EIN 30-0525224. Reported $88,371 of revenue for 2023 on its Form 990.

The IRS record

Registered name
COONSKIN PARK FOUNDATION
As the IRS records it, which is how it appears in their own search.
Employer Identification Number
30-0525224
The identifier the IRS uses for this organization.
Recognized under
501(c)(3) — charitable, religious, educational, scientific
The subsection of the code its exemption was granted under.
Recognized in
2014
The year of the IRS ruling.
Classification
Environment
NTEE code C50, assigned at registration.
Gifts to it
Contributions are deductible
Whether the IRS treats a contribution to this organization as deductible.
Legal form
Corporation
How the organization is constituted, as recorded at registration.
Location of record
Charleston, WV
The address the IRS holds, not necessarily where it operates.
Most recent filing
Form 990
For tax year 2023.

What it reported for 2023

$88.4 thousand
Total revenue
$88,371
Contributions, grants, program service revenue and investment income.
$81.1 thousand
Total expenses
$81,077
As reported on the return.
$139.2 thousand
Total assets, book value
$139,174
At the end of the year, at what the organization paid for them.
0
People listed
Officers, directors, trustees, key employees and highest-paid employees.
not reported
Largest reported compensation
This organization reported paying nobody it listed.

Similar organizations

Other organizations in the same state and category as Coonskin Park Foundation
OrganizationRevenue
Skytruth$3,932,279
West Virginia Land Trust Inc$3,072,841
National Center for Electronics Recyling$2,977,973
Oglebay Institute$2,933,090
Appalachian Headwaters Inc$2,781,159
Friends of the Cheat Inc$2,533,033

This organization elsewhere

More in West Virginia and under Environment. All organizations: nonprofits.

What this page cannot show

  • Everything here is what the organization told the IRS about itself. The IRS publishes returns as filed and does not audit them first.
  • The figures describe the most recent year on record, which is usually one to two years behind, and not the organization’s current position.
  • Nothing here says whether the organization does its work well, or how it spends what it raises beyond the totals on the form.

Something wrong? Tell us. Full method at methodology.

Sources

Data retrieved