Skip to content

Downtown Development Corporation

Rutland, VT. EIN 23-7384193. Reported $585,988 of revenue for 2025 on its Form 990.

The IRS record

DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Registered name
As the IRS records it, which is how it appears in their own search.
23-7384193
Employer Identification Number
The identifier the IRS uses for this organization.
501(c)(3) — charitable, religious, educational, scientific
Recognized under
The subsection of the code its exemption was granted under.
2018
Recognized in
The year of the IRS ruling.
Housing and Shelter
Classification
NTEE code L22, assigned at registration.
Contributions are deductible
Gifts to it
Whether the IRS treats a contribution to this organization as deductible.
Corporation
Legal form
How the organization is constituted, as recorded at registration.
Rutland, VT
Location of record
The address the IRS holds, not necessarily where it operates.
Form 990
Most recent filing
For tax year 2025.

What it reported for 2025

$585,988
Total revenue
Contributions, grants, program service revenue and investment income.
$486,364
Total expenses
As reported on the return.
$849,086
Total assets, book value
At the end of the year, at what the organization paid for them.
0
People listed
Officers, directors, trustees, key employees and highest-paid employees.
not reported
Largest reported compensation
This organization reported paying nobody it listed.

Similar organizations

Other organizations in the same state and category as Downtown Development Corporation
OrganizationRevenue
Champlain Housing TR$55,910,102
Vermont Housing Finance Agency$40,403,284
Gifford Retirement Community Inc$10,597,829
Downstreet Housing & Community Development Inc$10,418,229
Committee on Temporary Shelter$10,290,536
Eastview at Middlebury$9,773,069

This organization elsewhere

More in Vermont and under Housing and Shelter. All organizations: nonprofits.

What this page cannot show

  • Everything here is what the organization told the IRS about itself. The IRS publishes returns as filed and does not audit them first.
  • The figures describe the most recent year on record, which is usually one to two years behind, and not the organization’s current position.
  • Nothing here says whether the organization does its work well, or how it spends what it raises beyond the totals on the form.

Something wrong? Tell us. Full method at methodology.

Sources

Data retrieved