Skip to content

Impact for Jesus NFP

Itasca, IL. EIN 20-2191626. Reported $55,707 of revenue for 2025 on its Form 990-EZ.

The IRS record

Registered name
IMPACT FOR JESUS NFP
As the IRS records it, which is how it appears in their own search.
Employer Identification Number
20-2191626
The identifier the IRS uses for this organization.
Recognized under
501(c)(3) — charitable, religious, educational, scientific
The subsection of the code its exemption was granted under.
Recognized in
2005
The year of the IRS ruling.
Classification
Religion-Related
NTEE code X90, assigned at registration.
Gifts to it
Contributions are deductible
Whether the IRS treats a contribution to this organization as deductible.
Legal form
Corporation
How the organization is constituted, as recorded at registration.
Location of record
Itasca, IL
The address the IRS holds, not necessarily where it operates.
Most recent filing
Form 990-EZ
For tax year 2025.

What it reported for 2025

$55.7 thousand
Total revenue
$55,707
Contributions, grants, program service revenue and investment income.
$50.1 thousand
Total expenses
$50,142
As reported on the return.
$12.5 thousand
Total assets, book value
$12,518
At the end of the year, at what the organization paid for them.
0
People listed
Officers, directors, trustees, key employees and highest-paid employees.
not reported
Largest reported compensation
This organization reported paying nobody it listed.

Similar organizations

Other organizations in the same state and category as Impact for Jesus NFP
OrganizationRevenue
Religious and Charitable Risk Pooling Trust of the Brothers of$125,770,850
Tyndale House Ministries$66,185,392
Interfaith America$36,915,421
Word on Fire Catholic Ministries$30,699,778
Greater Europe Mission$29,435,355
Alpha USA$28,940,812

This organization elsewhere

More in Illinois and under Religion-Related. All organizations: nonprofits.

What this page cannot show

  • Everything here is what the organization told the IRS about itself. The IRS publishes returns as filed and does not audit them first.
  • The figures describe the most recent year on record, which is usually one to two years behind, and not the organization’s current position.
  • Nothing here says whether the organization does its work well, or how it spends what it raises beyond the totals on the form.

Something wrong? Tell us. Full method at methodology.

Sources

Data retrieved