Skip to content

Voter GA

Roswell, GA. EIN 16-1761224. Reported $384,351 of revenue for 2024 on its Form 990.

The IRS record

Registered name
VOTER GA
As the IRS records it, which is how it appears in their own search.
Employer Identification Number
16-1761224
The identifier the IRS uses for this organization.
Recognized under
501(c)(3) — charitable, religious, educational, scientific
The subsection of the code its exemption was granted under.
Recognized in
2007
The year of the IRS ruling.
Classification
Civil Rights, Social Action and Advocacy
NTEE code R40, assigned at registration.
Gifts to it
Contributions are deductible
Whether the IRS treats a contribution to this organization as deductible.
Legal form
Association
How the organization is constituted, as recorded at registration.
Location of record
Roswell, GA
The address the IRS holds, not necessarily where it operates.
Most recent filing
Form 990
For tax year 2024.

What it reported for 2024

$384,351
Total revenue
Contributions, grants, program service revenue and investment income.
$250,746
Total expenses
As reported on the return.
$247,647
Total assets, book value
At the end of the year, at what the organization paid for them.
0
People listed
Officers, directors, trustees, key employees and highest-paid employees.
not reported
Largest reported compensation
This organization reported paying nobody it listed.

Similar organizations

Other organizations in the same state and category as Voter GA
OrganizationRevenue
Christian Advocates Serving Evangelism Inc$66,682,317
Faith and Freedom Coalition Inc$26,101,107
BVM Capacity Building Institute Inc$25,246,868
Movement 4 Black Lives Inc$15,930,381
Progeorgia State Table Inc$10,105,268
Showing Up for Racial Justice Education Fund Inc$7,331,848

This organization elsewhere

More in Georgia and under Civil Rights, Social Action and Advocacy. All organizations: nonprofits.

What this page cannot show

  • Everything here is what the organization told the IRS about itself. The IRS publishes returns as filed and does not audit them first.
  • The figures describe the most recent year on record, which is usually one to two years behind, and not the organization’s current position.
  • Nothing here says whether the organization does its work well, or how it spends what it raises beyond the totals on the form.

Something wrong? Tell us. Full method at methodology.

Sources

Data retrieved