Skip to content
American Factbook
Menu

ELDERPET

DURHAM, NH. EIN 06-1714543. Reported $117,653 of revenue for 2024 on its Form 990-EZ.

American Factbook Research

The IRS record

06-1714543
Employer Identification Number
The identifier the IRS uses for this organization.
501(c)(3) — charitable, religious, educational, scientific
Recognised under
The subsection of the code its exemption was granted under.
2004
Recognised in
The year of the IRS ruling.
Animal-Related
Classification
NTEE code D20, assigned at registration.
Contributions are deductible
Gifts to it
Whether the IRS treats a contribution to this organization as deductible.
Corporation
Legal form
How the organization is constituted, as recorded at registration.
DURHAM, NH
Location of record
The address the IRS holds, not necessarily where it operates.
Form 990-EZ
Most recent filing
For tax year 2024.

What it reported for 2024

$117,653
Total revenue
Contributions, grants, program service revenue and investment income.
$29,113
Total expenses
As reported on the return.
$112,269
Total assets, book value
At the end of the year, at what the organization paid for them.
0
People listed
Officers, directors, trustees, key employees and highest-paid employees.
not reported
Largest reported compensation
This organization reported paying nobody it listed.

Similar organizations

Other organizations in the same state and category as ELDERPET
OrganizationRevenue
HUMANE SOCIETY FOR GREATER NASHUA CORPORATION$5,569,475
NEW HAMPSHIRE SPCA$5,037,612
MONADNOCK REGION HUMANE SOCIETY$2,354,933
POPE MEMORIAL HUMANE SOCIETY COCHECO VALLEY$1,920,656
JOHN HAY ESTATE AT THE FELLS$1,815,174
LAKES REGION HUMANE SOCIETY INC$1,651,823

This organization elsewhere

More in New Hampshire and under Animal-Related. All organizations: nonprofits.

What this page cannot show

  • Everything here is what the organization told the IRS about itself. The IRS publishes returns as filed and does not audit them first.
  • The figures describe the most recent year on record, which is usually one to two years behind, and not the organization’s current position.
  • Nothing here says whether the organization does its work well, or how it spends what it raises beyond the totals on the form.

Something wrong? Tell us. Full method at methodology.

Sources

Data retrieved