Skip to content
American Factbook
Menu

Chi Omega Fraternity

Kingston, RI. EIN 05-6022503. Reported $261,457 of revenue for 2023 on its Form 990.

The IRS record

Registered name
CHI OMEGA FRATERNITY
As the IRS records it, which is how it appears in their own search.
Employer Identification Number
05-6022503
The identifier the IRS uses for this organization.
Recognized under
501(c)(7) — social or recreational club
The subsection of the code its exemption was granted under.
Recognized in
1940
The year of the IRS ruling.
Classification
not reported
The IRS has never assigned this organization a code.
Gifts to it
not reported
The IRS file carries deductibility code 0, which it documents nowhere.
Legal form
Association
How the organization is constituted, as recorded at registration.
Location of record
Kingston, RI
The address the IRS holds, not necessarily where it operates.
Most recent filing
Form 990
For tax year 2023.

What it reported for 2023

$261.5 thousand
Total revenue
$261,457
Contributions, grants, program service revenue and investment income.
$218.7 thousand
Total expenses
$218,730
As reported on the return.
$86.3 thousand
Total assets, book value
$86,330
At the end of the year, at what the organization paid for them.
0
People listed
Officers, directors, trustees, key employees and highest-paid employees.
not reported
Largest reported compensation
This organization reported paying nobody it listed.

Similar organizations

Other organizations in the same state and category as Chi Omega Fraternity
OrganizationRevenue
COASTAL1 Credit Union$157,722,319
Aipso$140,283,243
The Providence Community Health Centers Inc$88,702,152
Teamsters Local 251 Health Services & Insurance Plan$76,394,551
Rhode Island Life and Health Insurance Guaranty Association$73,688,018
Delta Dental of Rhode Island$69,698,652

This organization elsewhere

More in Rhode Island. All organizations: nonprofits.

What this page cannot show

  • Everything here is what the organization told the IRS about itself. The IRS publishes returns as filed and does not audit them first.
  • The figures describe the most recent year on record, which is usually one to two years behind, and not the organization’s current position.
  • Nothing here says whether the organization does its work well, or how it spends what it raises beyond the totals on the form.

Something wrong? Tell us. Full method at methodology.

Sources

Data retrieved