Skip to content
American Factbook
Menu

ANGELS PROJECT

WAVERLY, TN. EIN 93-2502867. Reported $1,960 of revenue for 2023 on its Form 990-EZ.

American Factbook Research

The IRS record

93-2502867
Employer Identification Number
The identifier the IRS uses for this organization.
501(c)(3) — charitable, religious, educational, scientific
Recognised under
The subsection of the code its exemption was granted under.
2023
Recognised in
The year of the IRS ruling.
Human Services
Classification
NTEE code P20, assigned at registration.
Contributions are deductible
Gifts to it
Whether the IRS treats a contribution to this organization as deductible.
Association
Legal form
How the organization is constituted, as recorded at registration.
WAVERLY, TN
Location of record
The address the IRS holds, not necessarily where it operates.
Form 990-EZ
Most recent filing
For tax year 2023.

What it reported for 2023

$1,960
Total revenue
Contributions, grants, program service revenue and investment income.
not reported
Total expenses
As reported on the return.
$1,960
Total assets, book value
At the end of the year, at what the organization paid for them.
0
People listed
Officers, directors, trustees, key employees and highest-paid employees.
not reported
Largest reported compensation
This organization reported paying nobody it listed.

Similar organizations

Other organizations in the same state and category as ANGELS PROJECT
OrganizationRevenue
YOUTH VILLAGES INC$483,465,306
YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF NASHVILLE AND MIDDLE TENNESSEE$98,285,159
SOLES 4 SOULS$88,258,383
CHARITY GLOBAL INC$82,267,852
OPEN ARMS CARE CORPORATION$64,622,014
YMCA OF MEMPHIS & THE MID-SOUTH$62,721,668

This organization elsewhere

More in Tennessee and under Human Services. All organizations: nonprofits.

What this page cannot show

  • Everything here is what the organization told the IRS about itself. The IRS publishes returns as filed and does not audit them first.
  • The figures describe the most recent year on record, which is usually one to two years behind, and not the organization’s current position.
  • Nothing here says whether the organization does its work well, or how it spends what it raises beyond the totals on the form.

Something wrong? Tell us. Full method at methodology.

Sources

Data retrieved