Skip to content

HOPE ALIGHT

GRENADA, MS. EIN 87-2907281. Reported $12,113 of revenue for 2025 on its Form 990-EZ.

American Factbook Research

The IRS record

87-2907281
Employer Identification Number
The identifier the IRS uses for this organization.
501(c)(3) — charitable, religious, educational, scientific
Recognised under
The subsection of the code its exemption was granted under.
2021
Recognised in
The year of the IRS ruling.
Housing and Shelter
Classification
NTEE code L41, assigned at registration.
Contributions are deductible
Gifts to it
Whether the IRS treats a contribution to this organization as deductible.
Corporation
Legal form
How the organization is constituted, as recorded at registration.
GRENADA, MS
Location of record
The address the IRS holds, not necessarily where it operates.
Form 990-EZ
Most recent filing
For tax year 2025.

What it reported for 2025

$12,113
Total revenue
Contributions, grants, program service revenue and investment income.
$10,323
Total expenses
As reported on the return.
$9,480
Total assets, book value
At the end of the year, at what the organization paid for them.
0
People listed
Officers, directors, trustees, key employees and highest-paid employees.
not reported
Largest reported compensation
This organization reported paying nobody it listed.

Similar organizations

Other organizations in the same state and category as HOPE ALIGHT
OrganizationRevenue
EIGHT DAYS OF HOPE INC$7,183,767
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE MISSISSIPPI GULF COAST INC$5,542,310
MISSISSIPPI HIGH SCHOOL ACTIVITIES$5,170,331
BILOXI COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP$4,480,835
GRACE HOUSE INC$4,279,123
CATHOLIC CHARITIES HOUSING ASSOCIATION OF BILOXI INC$4,015,968

This organization elsewhere

More in Mississippi and under Housing and Shelter. All organizations: nonprofits.

What this page cannot show

  • Everything here is what the organization told the IRS about itself. The IRS publishes returns as filed and does not audit them first.
  • The figures describe the most recent year on record, which is usually one to two years behind, and not the organization’s current position.
  • Nothing here says whether the organization does its work well, or how it spends what it raises beyond the totals on the form.

Something wrong? Tell us. Full method at methodology.

Sources

Data retrieved