Skip to content

GIFT CLEARING TRUST

INDIANAPOLIS, IN. EIN 37-6639232. Reported $125,931,395 of revenue for 2024 on its Form 990.

American Factbook Research

The IRS record

37-6639232
Employer Identification Number
The identifier the IRS uses for this organization.
501(c)(3) — charitable, religious, educational, scientific
Recognised under
The subsection of the code its exemption was granted under.
2018
Recognised in
The year of the IRS ruling.
Philanthropy, Voluntarism and Grantmaking Foundations
Classification
NTEE code T11, assigned at registration.
Contributions are deductible
Gifts to it
Whether the IRS treats a contribution to this organization as deductible.
Trust
Legal form
How the organization is constituted, as recorded at registration.
INDIANAPOLIS, IN
Location of record
The address the IRS holds, not necessarily where it operates.
Form 990
Most recent filing
For tax year 2024.

What it reported for 2024

$125,931,395
Total revenue
Contributions, grants, program service revenue and investment income.
$188,508,679
Total expenses
As reported on the return.
$83,254,473
Total assets, book value
At the end of the year, at what the organization paid for them.
0
People listed
Officers, directors, trustees, key employees and highest-paid employees.
not reported
Largest reported compensation
This organization reported paying nobody it listed.

Similar organizations

Other organizations in the same state and category as GIFT CLEARING TRUST
OrganizationRevenue
RENAISSANCE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC$2,436,033,430
RAMTELL INC$273,797,686
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTHWEST INDIANA INC$208,501,276
ENDLESS SUCCESS FOUNDATION INC$119,021,163
LUMINA FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION INC$85,433,733
JAMES WHITCOMB RILEY MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION$72,810,348

This organization elsewhere

More in Indiana and under Philanthropy, Voluntarism and Grantmaking Foundations. All organizations: nonprofits.

What this page cannot show

  • Everything here is what the organization told the IRS about itself. The IRS publishes returns as filed and does not audit them first.
  • The figures describe the most recent year on record, which is usually one to two years behind, and not the organization’s current position.
  • Nothing here says whether the organization does its work well, or how it spends what it raises beyond the totals on the form.

Something wrong? Tell us. Full method at methodology.

Sources

Data retrieved