Skip to content
American Factbook
Menu

ENCORE DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES

CLINTON, IL. EIN 37-0958018. Reported $1,107,504 of revenue for 2024 on its Form 990.

American Factbook Research

The IRS record

37-0958018
Employer Identification Number
The identifier the IRS uses for this organization.
501(c)(3) — charitable, religious, educational, scientific
Recognised under
The subsection of the code its exemption was granted under.
1973
Recognised in
The year of the IRS ruling.
Mental Health and Crisis Intervention
Classification
NTEE code F20Z, assigned at registration.
Contributions are deductible
Gifts to it
Whether the IRS treats a contribution to this organization as deductible.
Corporation
Legal form
How the organization is constituted, as recorded at registration.
CLINTON, IL
Location of record
The address the IRS holds, not necessarily where it operates.
Form 990
Most recent filing
For tax year 2024.

What it reported for 2024

$1,107,504
Total revenue
Contributions, grants, program service revenue and investment income.
$1,092,198
Total expenses
As reported on the return.
$970,951
Total assets, book value
At the end of the year, at what the organization paid for them.
0
People listed
Officers, directors, trustees, key employees and highest-paid employees.
not reported
Largest reported compensation
This organization reported paying nobody it listed.

Similar organizations

Other organizations in the same state and category as ENCORE DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES
OrganizationRevenue
GATEWAY FOUNDATION INC$118,229,702
ROBERT YOUNG CENTER FOR COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH$39,734,234
HERITAGE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER INC$34,493,592
THE JOSSELYN CENTER NFP$32,109,178
TREATMENT ALTERNATIVES FOR STRONGER COMMUNITIES$31,844,875
RINCON FAMILY SERVICES$23,586,164

This organization elsewhere

More in Illinois and under Mental Health and Crisis Intervention. All organizations: nonprofits.

What this page cannot show

  • Everything here is what the organization told the IRS about itself. The IRS publishes returns as filed and does not audit them first.
  • The figures describe the most recent year on record, which is usually one to two years behind, and not the organization’s current position.
  • Nothing here says whether the organization does its work well, or how it spends what it raises beyond the totals on the form.

Something wrong? Tell us. Full method at methodology.

Sources

Data retrieved